People repeat work
Teams copy, chase, reconcile and correct because the process relies on memory and workarounds.
In six minutes, name the work that keeps going wrong, estimate what it consumes each year and get the next practical move to fix it—before you buy another tool.
No AI use case needed. No generic “maturity score”. Your result appears before we ask for your details.
The spreadsheet nobody trusts. The approval that stalls. The same customer details copied into three places. The report rebuilt by hand every Friday.
Teams copy, chase, reconcile and correct because the process relies on memory and workarounds.
Customers wait, decisions queue and valuable people spend their week feeding the process.
No single invoice shows the damage, so the problem loses to more visible priorities.
Your result names the condition keeping this process stuck—not your organisation’s “AI maturity”.
The pain is real, but the process boundary and owner are unclear.
Name itThe process is visible, but its baseline and commercial impact are not.
Count itThe case deserves action, but the proposed fix has not earned confidence.
Prove itA decision or pilot exists, but ownership, data or delivery is blocking progress.
Move itThe new route exists, but old work and low adoption keep the cost alive.
Embed itThe check combines observable process signals, a conservative capacity calculation and delivery evidence. The weakest condition becomes your diagnosis; ties are broken by the most commercially urgent unresolved condition.
It can be manual, slow, error-prone or simply unable to cope with demand. You do not need a solution—or an AI use case—to begin.
Prototype only. Your answers stay in this browser and are not submitted.
| When you need to… | Corbelle next step | Its job |
|---|---|---|
| See whether the process is worth attention | Process Pain Check + simple calculator | Free front door: name the constraint and show a conservative capacity range. |
| Turn the process into one testable AI idea | £7 Use Case Gameplan | Pressure-test a defined use case only after the problem is clear. |
| Build a board-grade investment case | Full AI Cost calculator | Model implementation, operating cost, risk, range and payback in detail. |
| Run the decision process yourself | AI Suite | Use the relevant stage: audit, prioritisation, solution match, governance or adoption. |
| Resolve complexity or lead the change | Work with Brendan | Facilitated diagnosis and execution where multiple teams, risk or material value are involved. |
No. It begins with work that is painful or expensive. AI may be one possible response, but the result can also point to simplification, better ownership, integration, training or stopping unnecessary work.
No. It is the loaded value of time currently consumed, shown as a conservative 25–50% recoverable range. Releasing capacity is not automatically a cash saving; the value appears only when the time is removed, redeployed or used to serve more demand.
Use the £7 Use Case Gameplan to pressure-test it. This check is designed for the earlier moment when the problem is felt but the right intervention is not yet defined.
Yes. Run it once per process. Comparing separate results is more useful than blending several workflows into one answer.
Operations, finance, technology, transformation and functional leaders in growing organisations—especially where manual work, workarounds, delays or repeated errors are absorbing meaningful capacity.